学校与家庭之间的伙伴关系
——合作还是冲突?
奥拉迪亚大学(University of Oradea),大学街1号,奥拉迪亚(Oradea),410087,罗马尼亚比霍尔(Bihor),电子邮件:bvali73@yahoo.com
摘要:校内合作问题是罗马尼亚和外国研究人员的普遍研究主题,他们普遍认为,教育过程的成功取决于两个因素的相互合作。本研究的目标是调查五所农村学校中学校与家庭合作的实际情况。该科目由来自罗马尼亚比霍尔的60名教师组成。问卷共有32项,在本研究中,仅考虑了这些项,这是指父母对课程/课外活动的计划。结果表明,协作只在一个方向上起作用,即从学校一侧到家长。
关键词::学校与家庭之间的合作; 教育伙伴关系;
1.简介
通过分析教育目的,我们可以了解到这一现象的复杂性,并且它的成就不能仅由一个人/机构负责(WD Nance,2000)。但是,受教育因素影响儿童形成的比例是可变的,这取决于他的年代顺序。因此,在儿童生命的头三年中,儿童教育的中心作用在于家庭,尤其是父母或法定监护人。他们的主要任务是托儿和他的早期社交。除家庭外,早期的教育成就还涉及到许多儿童保育机构和儿童保护机构,例如医疗机构,未成年人日托中心等。在第二个儿童期,提到的家庭和其他教育机构被添加到学前班,儿童形成基本的工具技能并进行第二次社交。从第三个童年开始,学校对人类个人培训的份额就变得越来越重要,在这种情况下,以前获得的基本购买得到了巩固,同时奠定了个人职业指导的未来基础。在那些被暴露的人中,我们意识到,尽管结构的每个部分(家庭,学校,社区)在实现孩子的教育方面都起着非常重要的作用,但统一完成整个过程是每个人之间密切合作的基础。如果伙伴关系管理不当,可能会导致相反的规则体系与家人,学校或一群朋友作为孩子的孩子的要求之间发生真正的冲突。
每个人都提出了日常教育活动中遇到的许多问题(M. Sanders和J. Epstein,2005,第203-204页):
学校中儿童登记制度的缺陷(填写必要的文件会挫败许多父母的注意力,或严重延迟孩子上学的时间);
使父母参与家庭活动或季节性活动与缺乏远程学习计划或模块化系统学习有关,这决定了学习跳跃;
1877-0428copy;2012由Elsevier Ltd.发布。由Huuml;seyinUzunboylu博士负责的Selection选和/或同行评审下的开放存取CC BY-NC-ND许可证。doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.850
1502 Valentin CosminBlacirc;ndul/ Procedia-社会与行为科学47(2012)1501 – 1505
一些父母与子女的老师合作不足;
因需要快速滚动教育课程而产生的压力,但并未考虑学生之间可能存在的差距。
从这个意义上说,人们一致认为,为面临困难的学生提供经济援助可以发挥重要作用。尽管如此,R。Chen(2008,p。215)观察到,大多数专家都以过于笼统的方式来对待这一现象,却没有理解根据学生的居住地区,他/她的不同而以不同的方式来理解所获得的财务帮助。社会文化地位或种族。因此,作者指出,许多父母送他们的孩子上学的次数正好在缺勤的数量之内,仍然使他们有资格从国家获得经济支持。另一方面,通过各种政府或非政府计划/项目,许多家庭(尤其是生活在贫困地区的罗姆人)获得了财政支持,以使子女上学,但他们将其用于其他目的。因此,应分别考虑每种情况。在孩子的住所进行家庭评估可以在此过程中发挥重要作用(AC Rule等,2008)。
2.研究
作为第一个结论,我们可以看到,父母有权被告知,并且有义务承认子女的学校行为,而每次需要解决问题时,教师都需要咨询并寻求他们的帮助和批准(RE Mitchell et al.2011)。
2.1目的
从上面开始,本研究旨在确定学校与家庭之间建立的教育孩子的伙伴关系的成就程度。具体而言,我们针对家长参与设计和教学以及开展学校组织的教学活动和课外活动的程度,要求家长参与孩子纪律行为管理的程度,以及家长参与教育的程度。哪些老师支持学生进行其他学习活动。
2.2样品
为这项研究选择了一个样本,该样本由在5个学校工作的60名教师组成,这些学校的班级为Avram Iancu,Bogei和,勒, 分别cu -比霍尔县。其中,男性占43.8%,女性占56.2%,完成学历的占37.8%,第二学士学位的占33.4%,其余29.8%属于一年级。选择该样本的原因是希望对“学校-家庭”伙伴关系是在小社区内进行的,经济发展中等,涉及失业,国外临时工作等诸多社会问题。
2.3仪器
本研究采用的方法以调查问卷为基础进行调查,对60名教师使用的工具由32个项目组成,分为以下类别:学校与家庭之间的协作方式,教育危机的处理,教师之间的协作结果的定量解释是通过计算受试者反应的频率来完成的,获得的数据以图形形式进行表示。
2.4结果
通过定量解释数据获得的结果非常有趣,可以如下查看*。
*
Valentin CosminBlacirc;ndul/ Procedia-社会与行为科学47(2012)1501 – 1505 |
1503 |
让父母参与选择教学策略和课程设计活动
80% |
62% |
66% |
62% |
70% |
||
决不 |
||||||
60% |
45% |
|||||
很少 |
||||||
40% |
25% |
25% |
25% |
28% |
||
20% |
经常 |
|||||
13% |
12% 18% |
|||||
20% |
9% |
10% |
10% |
好的 |
||
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|||
0% |
||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
图1.让父母参与选择教学策略和课程设计活动
从图1可以看出,调查中包括的大多数在学校教书的老师,从未习惯在选择教学/学习/
这些结果似乎更加令人惊讶,因为父母的一项基本权利(也是一项义务)是在学校期间询问子女,并在选择和开发课程时接受咨询,至少对于选修科目而言。相反,具有足够教学经验的教师认为他们不需要系统外人员的见解。另一方面,父母是否知道自己参与孩子的学校生活的权利,或者简单地说,他们没有时间或兴趣来参与孩子的学校生活。特殊情况是S08 C 活动。似乎在小社区中,即将出现“学校-家庭”关系,所有参与儿童教育的人都愿意合作。
图片2
老师要求学生解决学校纪律问题的人
80% |
62% |
58% |
66% |
66% |
65% |
60% |
|||||
40% |
25% |
26% |
14% |
20% |
20% |
13% |
16% |
10% |
15% |
||
20% |
10% |
||||
0%0% |
0%0% |
0%0% |
4% |
0%0% |
|
0% |
0% |
||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
没有人
班主任
学校校长
父母
学校负责人
图2.需要老师支持的学生在学校的学科问题的人
教师必须上课的最常见问题是学生的纪律行为管理。老师尝试单独解决这些问题,然后分别命令学校负责人联系班主任。除了一个例外- -老师不想通过父母的支持将问题外包(图2)。这表明学校与家庭之间的协作不足,可以解释为教师无法处理他们通常应该掌握的情况。此外,学生的纪律行为管理似乎是教学的本质,与教材的教学方法密切相关。
1504 Valentin CosminBlacirc;ndul/ Procedia-社会与行为科学47(2012)1501 – 1505
支持父母为子女创造有效的学习环境
80% |
73% |
72% |
58% |
60% |
||
60% |
50% |
决不 |
||||
剩余内容已隐藏,支付完成后下载完整资料
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 47 (2012) 1501 – 1505 CY-ICER 2012 The partnership between school and family - cooperation or conflict? University of Oradea, 1 University street, Oradea, 410087, Bihor, RomaniaE-mail: bvali73@yahoo.com Abstract The issue of school-family collaboration is a popular research theme both for Romanian and foreign researchers, who generally state, that the success of the educational process depends on the reciprocal collaboration of the two factors. The present study sets as its goal, to investigate the real aspects of the school-family collaboration in five rural schools. The group of subjects consisted of 60 teachers from Bihor, Romania. The questionnaire had 32 items and for the present research were taken only those items into account, which referred to the parental implication in the planning of curricular / extracurricular activities. The results show that collaboration function only in one direction, from the side of the school towards the parents. 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. copy; 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Huuml;seyin Uzunboylu Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. Keywords: school-family collaboration, disadvantaged social categories, educational partnership. 1. Introduction Analyzing the education purposes, we can get a image about the complexity of the phenomenon and that its achievement can not fall under the responsibility of only one person / institution (W.D. Nance, 2000). Share in which the educational factors get involved in the children formation is however variable, depending, among others, on his chronological age. Thus, in the first three years of life, the central role in child education lies to the family and, in particular, to the parents or to the legal guardian. Their main task is to child care and his early socialization. Alongside with family, to the early education achievement are involved a number of childcare institutions and child protection structures such as medical, day care centers for minors etc. In the second childhood, family and other educational agents mentioned are added to pre -school where the child forms the basic instrumental skills and perform its secondary socialization. School share to the human individual training becoming increasingly important starting with the 3rd childhood, an occasion in which the basic purchases acquired previously are consolidated, while putting the future foundation of the individual vocational guidance. Of those exposed, we realize that although each part of structure (family, school, community) has a very important role in achieving the childs education, to unitary fulfill the whole process is fundamental a close collaboration between each of them. If the partnership is not properly managed, it can lead to a genuine conflict between opposing systems of rules to the requirements of the child by family, school or group of friends to be ant eachers raised a number of problems encountered in daily educational activities (M. Sanders and J. Epstein, 2005, pp. 203-204): deficiencies of the child registration system in the school (completion the necessary documentation discourages many parents or cause significant delays in bringing the child to school); involving parents in domestic activities or seasonal activities correlates with the lack of distance learning programs or in modular system learning, which determines learning jumps; 1877-0428 copy; 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Huuml;seyin Uzunboylu Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.850 1502 Valentin Cosmin Blacirc;ndul / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 47 (2012) 1501 – 1505 insufficient cooperation of some parents with their childrens teachers; pressure created by the need to the scroll of the educational programs in a fast pace, which does not take account for possible gaps between students. In this sense, it is unanimously accepted that financial help given to pupils facing difficulties can play a significant role. Nevertheless, R. Chen (2008, p. 215) observes that most of the experts approach the phenomenon in a too general way, without understanding that the financial help received is perceived in different ways depending on the pupils area of residence, his/her socio-cultural status or ethnicity. Thus, the author points out that many parents send their children to school just as much as to be within the number of absences that still entitles them to receive financial support from the state. On the other hand, through various governmental or non-governmental programs / projects a great number of families (especially of Rroma ethnicity that live in underprivileged areas) have received financial support to send their children to school, but they used the support for other purposes. For this reason, each case should be considered separately. The family assessment carried out at the childs domicile can play an important role in this process (A.C. Rule et. al., 2008). 2. The study As a first conclusion, we can observe that parents have the right to be informed about and the obligation to acknowledge the school behavior of their children, whereas teachers need to consult and ask for their help and approval each time problems require to be solved (R.E. Mitchell et. al. 2011). 2.1 The objective Starting from the above, the present research we aimed to establish the degree of achievement of the partnership established between school and 剩余内容已隐藏,支付完成后下载完整资料 资料编号:[271949],资料为PDF文档或Word文档,PDF文档可免费转换为Word |
课题毕业论文、外文翻译、任务书、文献综述、开题报告、程序设计、图纸设计等资料可联系客服协助查找。